AFTE 2007-Tuesday, May 29
Sunday |
Monday |
Tuesday |
Wednesday |
Thursday |
Banquet |
Friday |
Vendors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FT
implemented the DFF (Depth From Focus)
acquisition technique in the latest version
of BrassTRAX-3D without any hardware change.
DFF is used to acquire and view the actual
3D topography of a cartridge case. We will
describe every step involved in this
technique and demonstrate how a 3D
topography is obtained from a set of 2D
images. DFF also generates a Best Focus
breech face image where any feature is in
focus, including the firing pin region. In
turn, this improves the 2D visualization.
Combining the 3D topography and the Best
Focus image generated by DFF yields a highly
realistic representation of the cartridge.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Objectives: (1) To suggest an approach to
defending the science of firearm/toolmark
identification that answers the most basic
questions about the foundation of our field
in a way that juries and attorneys can
understand. (2) To show that “real” science
supports firearm / toolmark identification,
not just our own “biased” literature.
Methodology: Review of firearm / toolmark
identification literature, metallurgy
textbooks and consultation with a
metallurgist.
Results: The scientific support for firearm
/ toolmark identification is overwhelming
and is based on basic metallurgy. However,
we have not addressed our underlying
scientific presumptions in a convincing,
straightforward way to people outside of our
field.
Conclusions: While preparing for a Daubert
hearing and trial, I developed an approach
to defending the science of firearm /
toolmark identification that differed from
others I have read or seen presented at AFTE
seminars and in classes. The material and
information is not new or novel, however, my
approach to the material may assist others
in their defense of the field.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There has
been a tremendous amount published and
presented dealing with how the discipline of
firearms and tool marks meets the various
elements of Daubert including: 1)
testability of the scientific principle
using the scientific method, 2) known or
potential error rate 3) the existence and
maintenance of standards of control, 4) peer
review and publication, and 5) general
acceptance in the relevant scientific
community. This series of discussions will
focus on Daubert principles in action. Each
of the presenters will highlight particular
prongs of Daubert and offer particularly
relevant questions and responses to aid the
audience in evaluating their own typical
responses with regard to these issues. The
presentation will conclude with a discussion
of the most recent Daubert hearing in San
Francisco.
It is important to remember that each
testimony is an opportunity to educate and
inform the criminal justice community of the
scientific validity of the firearms and tool
mark discipline and its application in the
criminal justice community. It is hoped that
this brief presentation will spur examiners
to an introspective assessment of their own
testimony and how improvement can be made.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

US v.
Diaz Court Ruling (pdf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first
part of the presentation will cover the
principle elements contained in the OODA
Loop developed by Colonel John Boyd. The
acronym stands for Observe, Orient, Decide
and Act. Boyd was an Air Force fighter pilot
who developed air combat strategies for the
US Military. Many of his contributions have
been adapted throughout the military and
used most notably in the first Gulf War. His
talent for elucidating the steps required
for obtaining and maintaining control in an
adversarial/confrontational situation has
also been used across all professional
domains. The second part will cover how the
OODA Loop functions to provide the expert
witness with a high degree of command and
control on the witness stand. The third part
will cover examples from the author’s
experience of 1600 courtroom trials.
Specifically, how the principles inherent in
the OODA Loop reduced confrontations on
cross examination, shortened time on the
witness stand, increased juror appreciation
while enhancing credibility as an expert
witness.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a
short presentation on the most common
submachine guns and assault rifles used by
the Basque terrorist movement (ETA). Special
attention will be paid to the hand made or
modified submachine guns. Further, the
evolutions and tendencies of the ETA
armaments will be discussed.

|
|
|
|
|
Afternoon Technical Session
Afternoon Moderator: Bruce Moran
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Objectives:
The purpose of this research was to determine if
identifications can be made with evidence recovered
from a site that has been subjected to fire damage.
Methodology: This section of the project was
conducted in conjunction with the ATF Fire Research
Laboratory, which was attempting to reconstruct a
crime scene in which a victim was found shot in a
truck that was also burned. During the
reconstruction, cartridge cases, bullets and a
firearm were burned in a truck similar to the one
found at the scene. Fired bullets were also inserted
in a pig that was also burned in the truck in order
to simulate the victim’s death. The firearms
evidence was collected from the truck and the pig.
It was then examined and compared for identification
purposes.
Results: The results showed that the some
evidence recovered can be identified to a particular
firearm, as well as to the other evidence collected.
Conclusions: It is possible to successfully
identify ammunition components that have been fired
from a gun prior to being burned in a fire. There
are many factors that will affect the potential for
identifications, including heat, changes to the
surface of the firearm, rust formation, pitting of
the barrel and breech and water damage to the
firearm.
Results from Part II specifically related to the
identification of the cartridge cases based on
chamber marks will also be discussed.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This presentation
will include an overview of the most recent Academy
class, the graduates and a brief rundown about the
upcoming class. The student selected by the NFEA
Staff to represent the graduating class will be
introduced.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The use of hammer
forging in the manufacture of gun barrels, popular
in Europe for years, is now being used more
frequently in the United States. This presentation
provides a description of the process for the hammer
forging of gun barrels and the manufacture of
mandrels used in the hammer forging technique. In
addition, this presentation documents research
completed on the individuality of three rifle
barrels that were hammer forged from a single
mandrel and the criteria for identification used in
this research. This study determined that barrels
hammer forged from the same mandrel produce unique,
reproducible and identifiable microscopic marks.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Objective: (1)
Introduce the Thunder Five revolver. (2) Brief
history of the company, Munitions International
Laboratories Incorporated (MILI). (3) Give a
detailed description of the manufacturing process of
the Thunder Five, which consists mostly of
investment casting. (4) Briefly discuss the effects
investment cast rifling could have on the
identification of fired bullets.
Methodology: The manufacturing facility of
the Thunder Five was toured to observe how the
rifling is investment cast into the barrel. While at
the factory, two revolvers were test fired and 45
test fires were obtained from each firearm. Several
specimens of barrels and frames from different
stages of the manufacturing process were also
obtained.
Results: Only a preliminary examination of
the test fires has been conducted so far and further
study would have to be performed to conclude whether
or not investment cast rifling produces unique
markings inside each barrel.
Conclusions: In general test fires from the
Thunder Five have poor rifling and several have
deformities. The concern for the firearms examiner
is the fact that the rifling in the Thunder Five is
produced by investment casting. Without any further
research there is no way to know whether or not
rifling that is investment cast has individual
characteristics that will allow a firearm to be
uniquely associated with a bullet fired through the
barrel. It is possible that because each barrel is
made by the same mold that similar microscopic
features will be imparted on bullets fired through
different barrels. But it is also possible that
because of the way in which the ceramic mold is
formed that the individual silicate grains could
form a unique surface pattern on each mold which
would then be imparted onto the steel poured in to
make the final product. The finishing processes
applied to the steel frame might also create a more
unique surface inside the barrel.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outline of
Objectives
Provide a different prospective for subclass
characteristics, with a view to provide a systematic
approach to avoid subclass influence to
identification
Brief
Methodology
- Discuss the
definition of “Subclass Characteristics” as
described in AFTE Glossary.
- Discuss that
CMS stated that subclass characteristics are a
problem and some examiners are reluctant to
identify no gun cases due to the possibility of
subclass characteristics.
- Explain the
two types of subclasses:
(1) Matching tool marks generated by the
machining process
(2) Matching tool marks generated by working
tool
- Provide a
different concept of generations of tool marks
using:
(1) Screw driver – door knob - cast
(2) Cutting Tool – Breech face – cartridge case
– photograph (digital images)
(3) Broach – barrel – bullet
- Explain how
subclass characteristics are only a result of
the upper generation tool marks.
- Provide
examples of unique marks for identification
using previous subclass papers.
- Introduction
to STRIA, Source Tool Recognition Identification
Approach, how to articulate tool marks observed
on work pieces.
- Explain how
to appreciate tool movement in order to tackle
subclass characteristics.
Summary
of Results
Subclass characteristics could be viewed as
different generations of tool marks. Examiners have
acquired the techniques through experience and now
it has become a problem only because we did not get
used to articulating tool mark formation and rule
out the possibility of subclass.
General
Conclusions
Subclass characteristics are very much like a phobia
if you do not face it. Learn more about how tool
marks are formed and prepare to articulate the
formation of marks then you can explain how you
eliminate subclass characteristics from your
identification.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within the framework
of the ENFSI Working Group "Firearms" a proficiency
testing programme on the detection and
identification of gunshot residues (GSR) by SEM/EDX
was set up and performed [1, 2]. The latest test was
carried out in 2005/06 (GSR2005). The test material
was designed by the Bundeskriminalamt and
manufactured on order by an external company for SEM
accessories. The participating laboratories were
requested to determine the total number of PbSbBa
containing particles on the test samples following
their own laboratory specific methods of automated
GSR particle search and detection by SEM/EDX.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This half-day workshop will acquaint participants
with the recognition and interpretation of tool
marks, specifically those produced by saws, on bone.
The workshop does not detail the identification of a
particular saw to tool marks in bone but, rather,
provides the participants with knowledge and skills
to interpret and classify a range of tools that may
have been responsible for producing the tool marks.
This hands-on
workshop will introduce the participants to various
techniques for measuring and interpreting class
characteristic data present within the tool marks.
Each group of participants will be provided with
casts of genuine tool marks in bone along with the
equipment necessary to evaluate the tool marks.
This project is
supported by Award No. 2005-IJ-CX-K016, awarded by
the National institute of justice, Office of Justice
Programs, US Department of Justice. The opinions,
findings and conclusions or recommendations
expressed in this publication/program/exhibition are
those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect
the views of the Department of Justice. This
research is also supported by the National Forensic
Academy, and Forensic Sciences Foundation, American
Academy of Forensic Sciences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This half-day workshop will be useful to those in
laboratories beginning the process of moving from
ASLCD/LAB Legacy standards to the ISO standards.
Participants will be introduced to highlights in the
ISO standards, the interpretation and implication of
these standards as they apply to the firearms and
tool mark discipline, and various ways in which
these standards are being met. This workshop should
be especially helpful in putting at ease much of the
misinterpreted, anecdotal information about ISO that
is spreading throughout laboratories nationwide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturers that sell high security locks with UL
437 OR ANSI ratings claim that they are highly
resistant to covert methods of entry, but are they
really in the high tech world of crime? This
workshop will focus on the most popular high
security locks in the United States: Medeco, Assa,
Mul-T-Lock, and Schlage Primus and why some of the
claims by certain manufacturers as to their security
may not tell the entire story. The UL and ANSI
standards will also be analyzed as to how they
define high security and why these standards may not
fully test for certain vulnerabilities. This
workshop will be an extension of the one given by
Marc Tobias in 2006 at Springfield on the threat
posed by lock bumping.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This half-day workshop will acquaint participants
with various digital imaging techniques and
applications for the firearm and tool mark
discipline. As systems become more cost-effective
and efficient it becomes increasingly valuable to be
able to understand and learn how to apply digital
imaging to firearm and tool mark casework and
evidence. This will be a hands-on workshop and as
such, registration will be limited. |

HOME
|
The Association
|
Members
Area |
Membership Info
AFTE Journal |
Online
Payments |
Examiner
Resources |
Training Seminar
Message Board |
Job Postings |
Forensic Links |
HELP

Copyright © 2006 Association of Firearm and Tool Mark Examiners
(AFTE).
All rights reserved. Revised:
May 30, 2007.
|